It’s been amusing joining the crowd in daily running our pieholes about last week’s Blackwater controversy.
The Rabbit’s normal approach, however, is more of a weekly examination of some industry issue rather than breathless reporting of the latest pscelebrity gossip.
So we’ll leave the rants, diatribes, and cool product news to others and go back to examining issues. Still through the vehicle of our 10-million gigawatt lightning rod, Blackwater, of course.
Was That 14 or 15?
Let’s start with a test. Some of you have seen it, but others have not.
We’ve got a video for you to watch. You should only watch it once. In the video you will see a group of basketball players, some dressed in white and some in black. They will pass two basketballs around. Your goal is to count how many times a player in a white shirt throws the ball. Watch it once and note your number.
If you saw thirteen passes, click here.
If you saw fourteen passes, click here.
If you saw fifteen passes, click here.
The Guy in the Fuzzy Bunny Suit
As the natural cynics expected, the test has nothing to do with the number of basketball passes.
The real question is whether you saw an animal passing by in the background—a wombat, a sloth, platypus, lemur, whatever.
The vast majority of people who watch this video never see the woman in the gorilla suit walk right into the middle of the game, stop, wave her hands, and then walk on. If you didn’t see it, go ahead and watch it again.
This is just one of a number of tests that show that humans are remarkably poor at grasping and retaining complex, stressful, or dynamic situations. The best explanation of the gorilla suit test is here, but this form of "cognitive blindness" is but one among many perceptual- and memory-related reasons that—contrary to common belief—eyewitness testimony is quite unreliable.
The Gorilla Did It
Now before yet another Rabbit statement gets taken out of context, let’s look at why this human foible is important.
The Iraqi Ministry of the Interior is busily collecting statements from various Iraqis who were at or near the scene of the incident (one would hope not statements from insurgents). The U.S Department of State is no doubt methodically debriefing all of the State personnel and Blackwater contractors who were involved.
And according to press reports, during the investigation phase, neither team is having squat-all to do with the other.
Now really, what in the sam hell results do you expect them to achieve?
The MoI already released its report, basically claiming the mercenaries were maniacally shooting everything moving and drinking goat’s blood out of baby skulls, while the U.S. will eventually get around to providing an extensive brief on how the contractors strictly followed the Rules For the Use of Force—and stopped mid-firefight to find a lost kitten and help two old ladies cross the street.
The point being Iraqi witness and Blackwater participant statements from the scene will be a jumbled morass of conflicting assertions. (Peter Singer is, as usual, slightly more diplomatic than us in making the same point.)
In the same vein, you’ve got the MoI issuing their list of seven Blackwater incidents—some deadly serious (like the Christmas Eve off-duty shooting and the Nisour Square incident) and some that have to be a joke (breaking a windshield? being at the scene of an insurgent vs. military firefight?). Meanwhile, the State Department is sort of saying ‘seven incidents in the middle of a warzone—they’ve only done 1800 missions just this year.’
In other words, we have a cornucopia of ammunition for extremists on both sides of the issue to use. The DailyKos crowd can vehemently screech about how Beelzebub in body armor gleefully mowed down dozens, and the Ann Coulter set can rail about how the dirty camelhumping savages got what they deserved and ought have another helping.
Don’t believe? Here is a mild example: "Baggarly is vehemently against the war, and Blackwater has become its face. No matter what the investigation finds, he said, it won’t change his opinion of the company. ‘Even if they fired second,’ he said, ‘I still consider them to be at fault. They’re at fault for being in Iraq in the first place.’"
For many people, the Iraqi and Blackwater witness statements may be a wash. Unless the national police headquarters video proves more helpful than the Sallyport video, or some reliable third party turns up during the joint committee’s work, we may never know ground truth about what happened.
So What’s Your Angle, Rabbit?
So, if we don’t rage about how one group (pick one) obviously wronged the other, what’s left to say?
After all, ‘what the license regime used to be’ type discussions are somewhat philosophical at this point, as Blackwater is already back at work and this is entirely a political issue now.
The political jockeying is clear to anyone who keeps an eye on Mess’opotamia: Minister al-Maliki is trying to keep the unwashed masses happy and keep cleric al-Sadr in check, the cleric wants everyone but him out or dead, President Bush wants them both to shut up and toe the line, etc.
But below the surface there is even more political intrigue and agenda—which is why we said before that this whole controversy really has little to do with the stinking license.
And that intrigue and agenda is our topic. Because it will have a great impact not only on the entire industry, but on the entire U.S. "thing" in Iraq. (War, occupation, mission, presence, effort—whatever implication-laden term you choose.)
Bad Blood
So who’s been the primary mover on the anti-PSC rhetoric coming out of Iraq? The Iraqi Ministry of Interior.
We’ve probably watched one too many bad made-for-TV detective movies, but we couldn’t help but wonder, "What’s their motive for this?"
With regard to Blackwater specifically, the most obvious answer is that Blackwater contractors / mercenaries have killed more than a couple of MoI personnel over the past few months. Let’s take a quick look (remembering that we don’t have all the facts on any of these incidents):
Certainly the most advertised and also, by appearances, the most clear cut: the Christmas Eve shooting, which The Rabbit used as a multi-part case study of contractor accountability issues. This involved an off-duty guy who got drunk at a bar run by government-civilians and then shot an MoI security guard. The shooter reportedly claims self-defense, but it would be good to see Justice/FBI get off the dime and do something with this case. We can’t find it so we would like to know: Has anyone asked them about it at a press conference or Congressional hearing?
Then in May of 2007, Blackwater forces on a motorcade ended up shooting an Iraqi driver (and reputed MoI employee) right outside the Ministry HQ. Reports from the scene range from ‘the driver did nothing wrong’ to the Blackwater guards "tried to wave off the vehicle, shouted, fired a warning shot into the radiator, then shot into the windshield when the driver refused to pull back … such steps are recommended under the rules for the use of force."
Add to that the fact that Iraqi Police (part of the MoI) and/or insurgents / freedom fighters posing as Iraqi Police have either exchanged fire with or fired upon PSCs—and Blackwater motorcades specifically—on numerous occasions, and you have a lot of ticked off folks inside the Ministry.
In short, when the opportunity to shiiv Blackwater came along, justified or not, the MoI was only too glad to get in as many blows as possible.
But this is the Middle East, and there is more to it than just bad blood.
Baksheesh
The fact is, the Ministry apparently is as corrupt and rotten through and through in fact as the U.S. government is in the hyperbole of pundits and partizans.
Here’s what was being reported (via NPR among other places) several weeks before the Nisour Square incident:
State Department investigators in Iraq have concluded that the government of Nouri al-Maliki is not capable of even rudimentary enforcement of anti-corruption laws. The investigators also say that corrupt civil servants with connections to the government are seen as untouchable, and that employees of Iraq’s watchdog Commission on Public Integrity have been murdered in the line of duty.
…
If you believe the report, and you listen to people who work at these ministries, you get the impression that corruption is completely sapping the country’s resources. I had a long talk this afternoon with someone who works at the Ministry of Interior—that’s the department that supervises all of Iraq’s police forces. And he told me that it’s corrupt from top to bottom—that officials at the top of the pile are making money from things like contracts to buy equipment.
NPR was far from alone in advancing this story, however. For example, The Nation ran "Corruption is ‘Norm’ Within Iraqi Government," which had this to say:
[The report] also maintins that the extensive corruption within the Iraqi government has strategic consequences by decreasing public support for the U.S.-backed government and by providing a source of funding for Iraqi insurgents and militias.
…
The Ministry of the Interior, which has been a strong hold of Shia militias, stands out in the report. The study’s authors say that "groups within MOI function similarly to a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) in the classic sense. MOI is a ‘legal enterprise’ which has been co-opted by organized criminals who act through the ‘legal enterprise’ to commit crimes such as kidnapping, extortion, bribery, etc." This is like saying the mob is running the police department. The report notes, "currently 426 investigations are hung up awaiting responses for documents belonging to MOI which routinely are ignored." It cites an episode during which a CPI officer discovered two eyewitnesses to the October 2006 murder of Amer al-Hashima, the brother of the vice president, but the CPI investigator would not identify the eyewitnesses to the Minister of the Interior out of fear he and they would be assassinated. (It seemed that the killers were linked to the Interior Ministry.) The report adds, "CPI investigators assigned to MOI investigations have unanimously expressed their fear of being assassinated should they aggressively pursue their duties at MOI. Thus when the head of MOI intelligence recently personally visited the Commissioner of CPI…to end investigations of [an] MOI contract, there was a clear sense of concern within the agency."
Gee, that doesn’t sound good.
But so what? What does utter corruption in the MoI have to do with the Blackwater incident, or the operation of other PSCs in Iraq?
Well,
Private security contractors in Iraq say most expatriate companies in the country operate without licenses because corrupt government officials who issue them demand bribes of up to $1 million.
"A couple of companies tried to get licenses, but no one has licenses because the bribes they were asking were too big, up to $1 million," said a member of the elite Blackwater USA security company, which has been ordered by Iraqi authorities to halt its operations.
So, now that the wellspring of $100 bill footballs has dried up, what’s a corrupt Iraqi official to do? Lean on someone for some graft? They won’t pay? Lean a little harder, like the May 2007 MoI protests about Blackwater. Still no baksheesh? Time to break some kneecaps.
And then, of course, there is the purported MoI involvement in illicit detention centers, torture chambers and death squads.
All these things have been regularly trotted out as evidence of just how abysmally U.S. policy in Iraq has failed. The Rabbit takes no position here on whether that is or is not the case. BUT, it is quite remarkable that this same thoroughly corrupt, rotten and evil MoI that is the scourge of all that is good in the world is suddenly quite reputable, fair and ethical when they begin to disparage PSCs and denounce "mercenary crimes." Then, it’s nothing but sunshine and puppy dogs.
Interesting, that, isn’t it?
Conclusion
Again, we hope that the joint report will bring us all some sort of hard evidence on exactly what happened. If the contractors / mercenaries failed to follow their Rules for Use of Force, then they certainly should be sent to a fair trial with due process safeguards. 
There is, however, significant cause to be very careful in considering information coming out of the MoI about PSCs in Iraq. To put it mildly.
The MoI, however, is not the only major faction in Iraq having a big ax to grind with Blackwater. Next week we’ll begin discussing one of the most viewed and least understood events from the Iraq Experience.
---------------
What people are saying about The Rabbit:
"The White Rabbit? There is no such thing. Never happened. When do I get the coke and hookers?" – Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, overheard backstage at Arledge Auditorium
9 comments:
I've read through the three part contractor accountability series and the follow ups. (How many people can say that?)
While well-researched, the articles are naive. There may indeed be laws on the books. But that's all they are.
The proof, after all, is you know where. And the fact that you must hope that a "press conference" can advance the cause of justice in the alleged December Blackwater shooting is a remarkably sad commentary. Last I checked, most homicide cops in the U.S. don't need a kick in the pants from a reporter to get the job done.
Suffice it to say that a law not enforced is not worth much. It's easy to say there are laws. It's much harder to believe, with a straight face, that you believe they are working--or even could be made to work.
The bottom line is that contractors are not accountable in any practical sense. To suggest otherwise is to put fiction over fact.
At least someone read them. And we prefer optimistic to naive.
The point is EXACTLY that there are laws on the books. The issue is not one of lack of law, it is a complete failure of enforcement. And so the debate over 'what new laws we need' is at best somewhat misguided.
A meaningful and helpful discussion would be "How do we ensure effective enforcement of the law and regs governing these individuals/companies?"
But what we have is "There's No Accountability!!"---the natural reaction to which in Congress, media, and the public is: let's pass a law!
And another empty law is the last thing we need.
Reminds me of a governing technique described in Ayn Rand's (massive) novel "Atlas Shrugged" - pass many laws so nearly everyone is breaking some law, then selectively enforce the laws to coerce behavior.
Hi Angus,
I have a new post up at the Monkey Tennis Centre on today's NYT story on Blackwater – turns out that Baghdad is actually a lot safer than anyone thought!
The post is here:
http://monkeytenniscentre.blogspot.com/2007/09/nyt-takes-aim-at-blackwater-hits-self.html
If you'd like to include the link in one of your posts that would be great. I have of course linked to you again. Great stuff.
Mike
We’ve got a video for you to watch. You should only watch it once. In the video you will see a group of mercenaries, some wearing sunglasses and firing automatic weapons. They will shoot several hundred rounds of ammunition around. Your goal is to count how many times a child is shot in the head or a woman crawling on her hands and knees to escape the bloodbath is shot in the back. Watch it once and note your number of unarmed civilians killed or wounded.
Of course... as the natural cynics expected, the test has nothing to do with the number of rounds or number of women and children slaughtered and other innocent bystander being routinely mowed down.
The real question is whether you saw the dancing ponies of freedom run by in the background. Or John McCain and Lindsey Graham strolling through the market purchasing pretty handmade rugs and fresh dates. Or the excited man in the Hazmat suit pointing to the exact location of the weapons of mass destruction hidden under a basket of pistachios! The vast majority of people who watch this video never see Paul Wolfowitz skipping by with a basket of fresh flowers and a cold lemonade or the little 20 something scrubby dubs from the Heritage Foundation passing out bundles of wet $100 dollar bills to smiling little Iraqi boys and girls on their way to the brand new victory bandstand to listen to the marine corp band play souza marches and sing the yellow rose of texas.
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRACTION (mission accomplished!):
If you didn’t see it, go ahead and watch it again (watch it until you see it).
This is just one of a number of tests that show that humans are remarkably good at trying to convince themselves not to pay attention to what is actually going on in front of them but rather to pay attention to the happy man in the furry fluffy dancing pony costume instead. The best explanation of the flight suit and codpiece on the carrier deck test is another example here, but this form of "cognitive blindness" is but one among many perceptual and public diplomacy-related reasons that—contrary to public relations efforts —so called "official" testimony is often quite unreliable or willfully deceptive or simply dishonest.
Look, over there, it's Jesus riding a white hare! (pay no attention to the gunfire behind the curtain).
What spectacular hand waving!
"Look, see! There was something else going on! Humans bad!"
"Iraqi Ministry of Interior! Pshaw, they're corrupt. Don't trust them, they just want bribes"
"Look, see? MoI employee can be bad, so they must be treated as bad!"
Nothing like tearing down your opponent when you're most likely in the wrong. I expect we'll hear about quite a bit of this.
Are you paid by the word, or by the diversion?
We keep hearing "there's a video." Where is that video of the mercenaries shooting children in the head? Where? Can you admit that there is even the possibility that the Americans were attacked and followed the rules of engagement? Nah, I didn't think you would. That's rational.
"Look, see! PSC employee can be bad, so PSCs must be treated as bad!"
For the record, I'm an infantry NCO about to go back for his third tour. (I reenlisted, so save your boo-hoos for someone who cares).
I'll say this: contractors earn the fair market value for what we all do over there. Soldiers don't because we're govt. employees just like the President. He doesn't earn what Michael Eisner does either. However, soldiers also get paid roughly the same salary whether we're at war or not, so it equals out eventually over a career.
Blackwater employees (who are all ex-Spec Ops guys; good luck being accepted if you're not) only get paid while they're at war. Thus, the higher pay ratio. Plus, they don't have the trillion dollar baggage that comes with govt. employees, such as health insurance, retirement pensions, initial training costs, etc. You'd be surprised just how expensive maintaining just one G.I. from basic training onward can be. It's a lot more than the cost of one Blackwater guy who's on average performing far more dangerous work on a daily basis.
Like I said, I'm in the infantry, and frankly, I'd rather the govt. farm out that type of protective detail work than make us do it. It's often dull and monotonous and it detracts from the real offensive operations that we're trained for. Plus, it would just be our heads that everyone would be calling for after we were forced to take the EXACT SAME ACTIONS that the press rails against Blackwater et al. for taking.
Newsflash: diplomatic convoys in Iraq are huge targets for the enemy, and Iraqi civilians are notoriously bad eyewitnesses of anything. During my last tour, local shopkeepers were being openly gunned down on the street by the Mahdi Army, aka JAM (guys dressed just like ordinary Iraqi "civilians") while we were literally a block away drinking chai with the local police captains trying to establish good rapport.
Within minutes we would haul to the scene on foot and ask who shot the man and people would point at us and say "you did." (Meaning U.S. soldiers.) We were the only ones in the area, so we knew this to be untrue, but the rumors (actually well-timed enemy propaganda) had already spread so fast that even this man's relatives were already convinced that we had shot him down. He had only been killed for this very reason: to blame on us and thus discredit all the hard work we had already put in around that section of Baghdad.
This type of scenario is what occurs on a daily basis all around Iraq. This is why the war has made such hard and slow progress. All-out combat is relatively rare in Iraq and has been for years. 90% of patrols go by without incident. But we are fighting an information war constantly, and it certainly does not help that our own media is so often complicit.
"Buck Sargent"
OEF 2003-04
OIF 2005-06
OIF 2007-??
Post a Comment